Skip to main content
Humanities LibreTexts

7.4: Middle Kingdom

  • Page ID
    108593
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    Middle Kingdom and Second Intermediate Period, an introduction

    by Dr. Amy Calvert

    The breakdown of centralized control that characterized the First Intermediate Period brought a new sense of uncertainty to Egyptian culture, which had been so stable for centuries. The overlapping internal struggles between regional rulers in the north and south eventually ended with the Theban nomarchs defeating the rulers at Herakleopolis and bringing all of Egypt under a single king again.

    The dynamic reunification of the Two Lands in ancient Egypt, in the period we call the Middle Kingdom, created new requirements for the king. No longer an aloof divine representative of the gods on earth, the king in the Middle Kingdom was expected to be more available to the people. This period also saw increased interactions with the outside world, the re-establishment of connections with Syria to the north and the establishment of forts reaching south deep into Nubia. Rich in literature (often of great knowledge and wit), this era also produced exquisite works of art. The cult of Osiris grew as did the number of Egyptians who could equip themselves for the afterlife, what we might recognize as a “middle class.”

    8fJwVESL9tR-w8qMOkk2fhzzl4ldU1ddNO4xgG-1SgC8xt4ayjZOhig_VSdaI0CWYAlvhKSj8VvuE_Q-Avva8fpdnyNVTpkdmjH5mmnNt590wjspIpSpEnrPTcQx7kCPjO_9gWih53pHXf0MnQ
    Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\): Map of Ancient Egypt (modified), showing Thebes in Upper Egypt and Memphis in Lower Egypt. (Original image: Jeff Dahl, CC BY-SA 3.0)

    Middle Kingdom (c. 2030–1640 B.C.E.)

    During the Middle Kingdom (Dynasty 11–13), many of the principles of Egyptian culture that had emerged at its outset and been codified during the Old Kingdom were adjusted and redefined. These included significant shifts in religious practices, afterlife beliefs, and the ideology of kingship.

    M5i62tMUjvL_WuaYJ24PQd2UBqo0MUTi1nH4tN4ZG_HxgTMyqzoZvptv_pFlRWq9b8AqfkLdvDlTJRwWNwlb-lLz3n84LaXcfQb4d-tQqPB9hxtEV1UEiGXxEDEonvVZ6DAI-eaILWeboMooWg
    Figure \(\PageIndex{2}\): Mortuary complex of Mentuhotep (with the later mortuary complex of Hatshepsut beside it), Deir El Bahari, Egypt. (Photo: Steve F-E-Cameron, CC BY-SA 3.0)

    Nebhepetra Mentuhotep II re-unified Egypt and established the Middle Kingdom, which is often considered the classical period for Egypt’s politics, literature, and art. Although he ruled the unified country from the city of Memphis, as the pharaohs of the Old Kingdom had done, he built his innovative mortuary complex on the west side of the Nile at Thebes (Figure \(\PageIndex{2}\)). He and his successors devoted considerable attention to the Theban region, adding to the already-established shrine of the local god Amun and building the initial core for the temple at Karnak (which would subsequently be added to by nearly every following ruler for millennia). There is evidence for vastly expanded royal patronage of divine temples all over Egypt during the Middle Kingdom. This campaign not only re-solidified the connections between the king and the gods, but was also a way to stress the king’s presence at key regional centers.

    Twelfth Dynasty rulers focused their attention on restoring the glories of the Old Kingdom while accommodating the beliefs, innovations in style, and architectural forms that were introduced or developed at Thebes. These kings constructed a new royal residence in the Fayum region southwest of Memphis and were buried nearby in pyramids with elaborate temples. Unfortunately, due to the construction methods used and later stone mining, none survives in good condition. Unlike the solid limestone Old Kingdom pyramids, Middle Kingdom monuments of this type were built with a core of mud brick. After the outer casing stone was removed for reuse during the ancient and medieval eras, the brick cores were exposed, and have long since eroded.

    2vapBqWlpvbQ5YUg6jSLxsVJe6FuR1kimjWcXXNe-dWgSXwYMBpwgMfq7--6a8FnhIl7UC3Myl3a--V2t-C0FZrLPBmZ-MaDw17l7CIoFYnDmhHEhEXWRUdVov_LUGp0BA3nsvkAXbJ8xP2ZYA
    Figure \(\PageIndex{3}\): Statue of Senwosret III (Senusret III), 1874–1855 BCE, 12th Dynasty. Incised granite, 122 cm high, found at the Temple of Mentuhotep. The British Museum, London. (Photo: The British Museum, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

    During the middle of the Twelfth Dynasty, a fascinating shift in the way pharaoh was portrayed occurred. In texts of the period, the role of the “Good Shepherd” becomes emphasized and, around the same time, the weight of royal responsibilities becomes evident in representations of the king. This dramatic shift in style is most clearly seen in the facial features of images of Senwosret II, Senwosret III (Figure \(\PageIndex{3}\)), and Amenemhat III. Looking at these heavy faces, with their creased brows and drooping mouths, it is clear that profound changes had occurred.

    5QGp4fLKNTziEoC2ZK7LXxrJNL3yGy0pbQECJW_CF-g36VXkIxmfRUayCgz4mIep0qKzRzBjqkAdq_Y6QCRFYXLsF4UsVpx0wB1JikusC_eU4_qpQ23RMUaT3R394q78U6Z7XX_-Yr-ASvrHKA
    Figure \(\PageIndex{4}\): Model of a brewery, first Intermediate Period or Middle Kingdom, 2040–1991 BCE. Painted wood, 28.5 x 32.5 x 53.5 cm. Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. (Photo: Museum of Fine Arts, public domain)

    Elite necropolises carved into cliff sides along the Nile preserve non-royal aspects of the mortuary cult in this time. Much of the iconography in the tomb scenes is similar to late Old Kingdom, but new scenes also appear, including the representations of deities, especially the god Osiris. Models with figures in lively poses performing daily activities, like brewing (Figure \(\PageIndex{4}\)), baking, and slaughtering cattle, were found in tombs of this era. Also during this period servant figures known as shabtis, which were designed to work for the deceased in the afterlife, began to appear. Private monuments dedicated to Osiris become prevalent and indicate a democratization of access to the divine, allowing more people the opportunity to interact with the gods.

    I9_5l16aPdDUmK57ap4TsbfcFkKaFlsweAXdq80XSkQZKNYF2GhrxszA0WQWwByzFhqxDWrBLQn6KYcV-lz9yUc1hwBvfgqAwoFbHKXe358cn9xjFt1PwPNVDAh1HbcdvkfrZQRN0FutnDg1rQ
    Figure \(\PageIndex{5}\): Part of the Treasure of Tod, including rectangular chests; silver vessels, ingots, and chains; and raw and worked lapis lazuli. Found under the temple of Montu at Tod and dating to the reign of Noubkaoure Amenemhat II. The Louvre Museum, Paris. (Photo via Smarthistory)

    Rulers during the Middle Kingdom expanded control to the south into Nubia, building a series of mudbrick forts along the river as far south as Semna (below the Second Cataract) in order to better control the mines of gold and other valuable materials in the region, such as ebony, ostrich feathers, leopard skins, ivory, exotic animals, incense and a variety of hard stones. They also re-established trade routes to far-off Syrian cities for luxury goods such as cedar, wine, silver, and oil. There is evidence for robust trade interactions with other cultures as well: Minoan pottery sherds suggest trade with Crete and Asiatic artifacts, like large numbers of weights found in urban settings and the stunning assemblage of treasure (Figure \(\PageIndex{5}\)) discovered in four bronze chests under the temple of Montu at Tod, indicates connections beyond Syria-Palestine.

    16.1.3_front.jpg
    Figure \(\PageIndex{6}\): Pectoral and Necklace of Sithathoryunet with the Name of Senwosret II, c. 1887–1878 BCE. Cloisonné with gold, carnelian, lapis lazuli, turquoise, garnet, 1 ¾ x 1¼”. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. (Photo: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, public domain)

    This was a period of wealth and prosperity—a rich body of literature was produced, relief carvings of sublime beauty were created, bronze metalworking appears, and some of the most exceptional jewelry from the ancient world was crafted during this time. Several sets of highly-symbolic jewelry were discovered in the tombs of royal women (Figure \(\PageIndex{6}\)). Imagery in the jewelry, statuary, and other depictions of royal women during this period show a strong connection between them and the goddess Hathor. Both the mother and wife of Horus in various myths, Hathor was also described as the mother, wife, or daughter of the sun god Ra—both male deities that the king was closely linked with. Royal women seem to have been viewed as mortal representatives of Hathor, serving a vital function in regeneration.

    hjRgl5tahRrbCV9LBqJeNbLjdLFhIE7aTVVAN5NfS3vtDZn74DSxDW5LbA7a246D9pmYyPNopfsCrK5sAbEdx4qTlnoN0cfjckEg6ECz3ZcFtlYJ3STQrvmyK8DRurAbPf7QEZPudu0BMAJPZg
    Figure \(\PageIndex{7}\): Head of a female sphinx, c. 1876–1842 BCE, Dynasty 12, Middle Kingdom. Chlorite, 38.9 x 33.3 x 35.4 cm. Brooklyn Museum, Brooklyn. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum, CC BY)

    Female sphinxes (Figure \(\PageIndex{7}\)) appeared during the Middle Kingdom, emphasizing a new connection between royal women in the fiercely protective role of the sun god’s daughter, the Eye of Ra. Although in general these developments in identity didn’t necessarily indicate significant changes in political status for royal women, it is interesting that the last king of the Twelfth Dynasty was the first known sole female ruler of Egypt, Nefrusobek.

    By the Thirteenth Dynasty, centralized royal authority was again on the decline and control over Lower Egypt became more challenging. The ruling city of Lisht was abandoned and the kings reestablished the royal court and administrative seat in the southern city of Thebes. It would be nearly 150 years before a king would rule again over the united Two Lands.

    HIAhfSvGOxIr2QooGciYsnHM0S9lz3IgM6E6s9C9Dj6tMvMlHABLN7Vs-WVJO_YJXewR33LyPko1YnEUr1d7rw94y9SJbv4COj7Z0LfUKsAN4Xr5GYqZNFe7lBSPLj9l5F7FrGlRZ2RG_2VoPw
    Figure \(\PageIndex{8}\): Reconstructed Minoan fresco showing bull-leaping from Avaris, Egypt. Heraklion Archaeological Museum, Crete. (Photo: Martin Dürrschnabel, CC BY-SA 2.5)

    Second Intermediate Period (c. 1640–1540 B.C.E.)

    During the seventeenth century B.C.E., a group who originated in Western Asia and had blended into the local population of the delta region took control of the north of the country. Their kings were referred to as the hekau khasut, otherwise known as the Hyksos. These “rulers of foreign lands” established their own capital at Avaris and ruled the north, even calling themselves “Sons of Ra.” Archeological evidence shows that the community of Avaris had many decidedly non-Egyptian characteristics. Differences in house layouts, pottery types, weapons and tools, and burials being integrated into the settlement, as was common in western Asia, instead of separated (as was usual for the Egyptians), all point to a largely Syrio-Palestine population.

    New words entered the Egyptian vocabulary during this period, as did Near Eastern deities, like Anat, and weapons including the scimitar and horse-drawn chariot. The international nature of the site is also evident in the startlingly Minoan-style murals of bull jumping (Figure \(\PageIndex{8}\)), although these may date slightly later. Egyptian pharaohs still ruled from the south at Thebes, and there was a series of conflicts and battles for control. Textual evidence indicates that the king at Avaris was corresponding with the Nubian king of Kush at Kerma via the Western Oasis route in an effort to ally against the Egyptians at Thebes; their messengers were intercepted and communications cut off by the pharaoh Kamose who recorded his campaigns against them in stelae erected at Karnak temple. Eventually, Ahmose was successful in driving the Hyksos king out of the delta and re-unifying the land under a single ruler.


    Middle Kingdom Egypt: Senusret III & Block Statues

    By Boundless Art History

    During the Middle Kingdom, relief and portrait sculpture captured subtle, individual details that reached new heights of technical perfection. Some of the finest examples of sculpture during this time was at the height of the empire under Pharaoh Senusret III.

    Senusret III (also written as Senwosret III or Sesostris III) ruled from 1878–1839 BCE and was the fifth monarch of the Twelfth Dynasty of the Middle Kingdom. His military campaigns gave rise to an era of peace and economic prosperity that not only reduced the power of regional rulers, but also led to a revival in craftwork, trade, and urban development in the Egyptian kingdom. One of the few kings who were deified and honored with a cult during their own lifetime, he is considered to be perhaps the most powerful Egyptian ruler of the dynasty.

    image11-4.jpeg
    Figure \(\PageIndex{9}\): Three black granite statues of the pharaoh Senusret III, seen in right profile, Twelfth Dynasty, c. 1850 BCE. British Museum. (Photo: Captmondo, CC BY-SA 3.0)

    Aside from his accomplishments in architecture and war, Senusret III is known for his strikingly somber sculptures in which he appears careworn and grave. Deviating from the standard way of representing kings, Senusret III and his successor Amenemhat III had themselves portrayed as mature, aging men. This is often interpreted as a portrayal of the burden of power and kingship. The change in representation as ideological, and not something to be interpreted as the portrayal of an aging king, is shown by the fact that in one single relief, Senusret III was represented as a vigorous young man, following the centuries old tradition, and as a mature aging king.

    Block Statues and Women Patrons

    image12-4.jpeg
    Figure \(\PageIndex{10}\): Block-statue of Pa-Ankh-Ra, ship master, bearing a statue of Ptah, Late Period, c. 650–633 BCE. Bibliothèque nationale de France, Paris. (Photo: Jastrow, public domain)

    Another important innovation in sculpture that occurred during the Middle Kingdom was the block statue, which would continue to be popular through to the Ptolemaic age almost 2,000 years later. Block statues consist of a man squatting with his knees drawn up to his chest and his arms folded on top of his knees. Often, these men are wearing a wide cloak that reduces the body of the figure to a simple block-like shape. In some cases the cloak covers the feet completely, and in others the feet are left uncovered. The head of the sculpture contains the most detail.

    The sculpture pictured in Figure \(\PageIndex{11}\)—the fact that a private woman could have a sculpture made for herself—speaks volumes for the equality of gender in ancient Egypt. The heavy tripartite wig frames the broad face and passes behind the ears, thus giving the impression of forcing them forward. They are large in keeping with the ancient Egyptian ideal of beauty; the same ideal required small breasts, and in this respect, the sculpture is no exception. Whereas the natural curve of the eyebrows dips towards the root of the nose, the artificial eyebrows in low relief are absolutely straight above the inner corners of the eyes, a feature which places the bust early in the early Twelfth Dynasty. Around 1900 BCE, these artificial eyebrows, too, began to follow the natural curve and dipped toward the nose.

    image13-4.jpeg
    Figure \(\PageIndex{11}\): Head and Torso of a Noblewoman, c. 1844-1837 BCE. Diorite, 9 x 6 1/4 x 4 1/2 in. (22.9 x 15.9 x 11.4 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Brooklyn. (Photo: Kaitlyn153, CC BY-SA 2.0)

    Articles in this section:


    • Was this article helpful?