Skip to main content
Humanities LibreTexts

4.3: Whose mistake? Reading like writer

  • Page ID
    15683
  • Read like a writer 

    When you're reading like a writer, you're more attuned to the ways that writers create meaning. You're also reading with a spirit of generosity: as a writer yourself, you know how hard writing is, and you will find yourself more forgiving those minor lapses in control in writing. You're also reading with the intention of making the words on the page make sense. You know the writer had something important to say, and you want to do your best to figure it out.  Sometimes sentences are confusing, but rarely does a writer intent to write a confusing sentence. Consider this headline that confused me at Halloween

    Halloween treats kids, adults will want to eat

    I was confused by this headline. I was misreading the headline because there were missing words, and I was putting those missing words in the wrong place. I read it as

    Halloween treats kids (that) adults will want to eat

    When I should have read it as 

    Halloween treats (that) kids (and) adults will want to eat

    So whose error was it? Does it even matter? In the end, I figured out what the headline meant

    What is an error?

    The most important errors to pay attention to in writing are those that change the meaning. There are a lot of grammar jokes that play on the idea that grammar sometimes changes the meaning. For example, 

    • Grammar: it's the difference between knowing your shit and knowing you're shit
    • Grammar saves lives: Let's eat, Grandma, NOT Let's eat Grandma

    One of my favorite grammar jokes is this one

    Image of cat asleep with text "I'm silently judging you're grammar"

    <image "Cats don't care" by Robert Wyckoff CC-BY>

    You may have seen a sticker, mug, tshirt or meme with the "correct" version. In this version, the "error" doesn't change the meaning. Instead, it works as a kind of irony. While many people (but not cats) can't help but to judge others' grammar usage, in reality very, very few people know all of the rules and never make mistakes.

    Making and Using a Log of Your "Mistakes"

    Many writing teachers advocate using a editing log to keep track of your "mistakes". These teachers rightly believe that such a practice creates more autonomy and agency in students. This autonomy is key to students finding their authentic voice.

    Traditionally, to make an editing log, create four columns. Label each column: Error Example, Name of Error, Explanation, Correction Example. When you are editing your work and find a mistake, jot down the word, sentence, or phrase that is problematic in the first column. Then use your editing resources to figure out what that kind of error is called, and write that label in the second column. In the third column, write out what you need to find a solution, whether that’s a definition, an explanation, a page number in a book or an online link. Finally, in the last column, write out the corrected word, phrase, or sentence.

    Here’s an example:

    Error Example Name of Error Explanation Correction
    Honesty is it’s own reward. Apostrophe error “It’s” means “it is”; use “its” for the possessive. Honesty is its own reward.

    As a variation to the editing log, consider this modification:

    Example Error or Variation? Explanation Correction
    It be like that sometimes. Variation a variation of the phrase "That's the way it is sometimes" Not needed

    Errors that might matter: Use modifiers clearly and precisely

    Modifiers are words and phrases that add information to a sentence. They specify the meaning of (that is, they modify) a noun or verb. Sometimes the modifier is misplaced, ambiguous, or not clearly pertaining to a noun or verb (a so-called dangling modifier). These problems can lead the reader to wonder what exactly you’re claiming.

    MISPLACED: The ski-jumper looked sleek in his new suit weighing only 140 pounds.

    CORRECT: The ski-jumper looked sleek wearing a new suit and weighing only 140 pounds.

    The suit didn’t weigh 140 pounds (one hopes); the ski-jumper did.

    AMBIGUOUS: When formal rules and day-to-day practices differ, they should be changed.

    CLEAR: Formal rules should be changed to match day-to-day practices.

    CLEAR: Day-to-day practices should be changed to match the formal rules.

    In the first version, it’s not clear what should be changed. The two clear versions make it obvious what the author is arguing.

    DANGLING: Walking down the street, the houses glowed pink in the sunset.

    CORRECT: Walking down the street, she saw houses glowing pink in the sunset.

    The first version suggests that the houses were walking down the street. The pronoun to which that first phrase refers (“she”) is missing. The second version corrects that by bringing in the needed pronoun.

    Errors that might matter: Choose correct words

    Many wrong-word errors that I see seem to be artifacts of the spell-checkers built into word-processing programs. For example, I often see “costumers” where students meant “customers,” “defiantly” instead of “definitely” and, somewhat comically, “martial” instead of “marital.”

    Other wrong-word errors come from homonyms, two or more words that sound the same, such as the there/their/they’re or your/you’re errors. In college writing, another common one is the misuse of effect/affect. Use “effect” if you’re talking about the result of a cause as a noun, and “affect” if you mean influence or talking about emotion in psychology (in which case it’s pronounced AF-fect).

    CORRECT: The effects of the conflict have been long-lasting.

    CORRECT: The conflict has affected everyday life throughout the country.

    CORRECT: Research shows that the presence of living plants impact both cognition and affect.

    “Effect” can also be a verb, in which case it means to bring about:

    CORRECT: The conflict effected major international policy changes.

    That sentence is saying that the conflict brought about policy changes. If you wanted to say that the conflict influenced (but did not itself cause) policy changes, you would write that the conflict affected policy changes.

     

     

    • Was this article helpful?