Skip to main content
Humanities LibreTexts

5.1: Data Collection

  • Page ID
    98093
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    Between September 9, 2019 and October 9, 2019, a six-person PIL Team collected empirical data from 16 student focus groups and 37 telephone interviews with faculty at eight U.S. colleges and universities. Institutions in the sample were selected for regional diversity, students’ demographic variation, and whether they were located in red or blue states, given the 2016 definition of these voting categories; both a R1 university and a community college were included in the sample (Figure 3 and Table 2).

    An email invitation was sent to a randomly selected sample of full-time students on each campus asking them to participate in an hour-long focus group. Two focus groups were held on each campus. A $20 gift card was offered to all participants who attended all or part of the student focus group. An email invitation was also sent to faculty to participate in a 25- to 30-minute telephone interview. At schools with a sizeable number of teaching faculty, a random sample was used.

    clipboard_e8cbdb149727718e9e2125bf795295df5.png
    Figure 3: Institutional sample map
    Table 2: Institutional sample
    College or University Location Type Focus Groups Faculty Interviews
    California State University Maritime Academy Vallejo, CA Public 10 2
    Clark University Worcester, MA Private 15 8
    Corban University Salem, OR Private 16 3
    Emporia State University Emporia, KS Public 12 5
    Grinnell College Grinnell, IA Private 17 5
    Keene State College Keene, NH Public 14 4
    Oregon State University Corvallis, OR Public 8 7
    Ozarks Technical Community College Springfield, MO Public 11 3

    References

    1. These scripts are available on the “PIL algorithm project” landing page at https://www.projectinfolit.org/algo_study.html

    Contributors and Attributions

     


    This page titled 5.1: Data Collection is shared under a not declared license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Alison J. Head, Barbara Fister, & Margy MacMillan.

    • Was this article helpful?