Skip to main content
Humanities LibreTexts

17.6: Irregular Resolutions of Secondary Chords

  • Page ID
    119348
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    17.6 Irregular Resolutions of Secondary Chords

    The roots of secondary dominants do not always resolve down a perfect fifth to the tonicized chord. In many of the examples of popular music with secondary dominants at the beginning of this chapter, the secondary dominants resolve deceptively.

    sec-dom-yesterday-with-RN.svg

    /
    Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\): Paul McCartney, “Yesterday” (1965)

    In “Yesterday,” the VVV/V resolves not to VV but to IVIV, which sometimes acts as a substitute for the VV chord (the dominant) in popular music.

    This progression also happens in “Forget You,” where a VVV7/V resolves to a IVIVchord.

    sec-dom-forget-you-with-RN.svg

    /
    Figure \(\PageIndex{2}\): Bruno Mars, CeeLo Green, Philip Lawrence, and Ari Levine, “Forget You” (2010)

    In “I Want You to Want Me” by Cheap Trick, the VVV/V chord resolves to a subtonic ♭VIIVII chord in A major.

    sec-dom-cheap-trick-with-RN.svg

    /
    Figure \(\PageIndex{3}\): Rick Nielson, “I Want You to Want Me” (1977)

    Remember, however, that the subtonic ♭VIIVII in major can act as a substitute for the dominant (see the Harmonic Flowchart for Popular Music with Subtonic VIIVII chord in Major).

    In “Baby Love” by the Supremes, a CBC7/B♭ in C major (VIVV24/IV) resolves to an AA7chord (ViiV7/ii), which then resolves to iiii (DmDm). In this example, notice that the B♭ in the CBC7/B♭ is a lowered chromatic note that wants to resolve downward by half step to A. Instead of this A being the third of the IVIV chord (an F major chord), which is the traditional and expected resolution, it is the root of an AA7 chord (ViiV7/ii).

    sec-dom-baby-love.svg

    /
    Figure \(\PageIndex{4}\): Lamont Dozier, Brian Holland, and Eddie Holland, “Baby Love” (1964)

    Finally, a rather common deceptive resolution of a secondary dominant is VviV7/vito IVIV, which can be seen in the following three examples.

    sec-dom-sitting-on-the-dock.svg

    /
    Figure \(\PageIndex{5}\): Steve Cropper and Otis Redding, “(Sittin’ On) The Dock of the Bay” (1967)

    sec-dom-imagine.svg

    /
    Figure \(\PageIndex{6}\): John Lennon, “Imagine” (1971)

    sec-dom-waldstein-ST.svg

    /
    Figure \(\PageIndex{7}\): Beethoven, Piano Sonata Op. 53, I (1804)

    There are two ways to conceptualize this progression. The first is that the progression of iiiiii to IVIV (Em to F in C major) is not unusual, so E to F, which appears to be IIIIII to IVIV but is in fact VviV/vi to IVIV, is a chromatic modification of iiiiii to IVIV. The other way to think of VviV/vi to IVIV is as VviV/vi to VIviVI/vi, a deceptive progression within the submediant area.

    We can conclude that secondary chords do not always resolve strictly to the chords they appear to be tonicizing.


    This page titled 17.6: Irregular Resolutions of Secondary Chords is shared under a GNU Free Documentation License 1.3 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Robert Hutchinson via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform; a detailed edit history is available upon request.