Skip to main content
Humanities LibreTexts

6.4.1: Could/Should/Ought to/Had Better

  • Page ID
    269954
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)

    Options and Advice — Could vs. Should

    COULD

    a little strengthCould expresses an idea, option or solution for someone else to take. Could does not express judgment about what is "right" to do. Could leaves the decision making to the other person. It can be used when the other person is [1] a peer (same status, rank, age), [2] is an acquaintance, [3] is greater in status (different rank, social level).

    Oh no! My wallet isn't here in my bag.

    MODAL PLAIN FORM VERB

    You could

    go back to where you last opened your bag and look around.

    You could

    walk back along the way you just walked.

    You could

    search the pockets of your bag / backpack.

    You could

    ask people if they have seen it.

    SHOULD

    strongerShould expresses opinion about a smart action for someone else to take. Should expresses advice about what is "good" to do. It is used to influence or affect the other person's decision-making. It is used in situations where the other person is [1] a peer (same status, rank, age) [2] is familiar (well known), [3] or is a family member.

    Oh no! My wallet isn't here in my bag. (peer to peer)

    MODAL PLAIN FORM VERB

    You should

    check the places you have been today.

    You should

    cancel your credit cards.

    You should

    notify campus security / police.

    You should

    arrange to get a new identification card.

    Creative Commons License Could vs Should-Grammar Quizzes by Julie Sevastopoulos is licensed for use under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 International.

    Ought to

    OUGHT (TO) / IT'S A GOOD IDEA

    weaker wordingOught (to) acts very much like a modal except that it is used with an infinitival complement. The modal or the infinitive clause can be negated without much difference in meaning. The question form is not used very much. Ought expresses weaker advisability than have (to).

    OUGHT INFINITIVAL FORM

    You ought

    to use your car less.

    You ought not

    to use your car so often.
    (not advisable)

    You ought

    to not use your car so often.
    (advisable not to use it.)

    Ought you

    to use your car so often?

    It's a good idea

    to leave your car in your garage.

    Had Better

    Strong Advisability

    Had Better (correct) v. Had Better (error)

    HAD BETTER

    Had better refers to the immediate future and is used to give strong advice (in some cases threatening advice!) It is more urgent than should or ought to. The had in had better does not behave like other auxiliary verbs.

    FORM

    You had better close the door open or (else) all the heat will go out.

    NEGATIVE

    You had better not close the door or the cat will be trapped inside.

    NEGATIVE QUESTION

    Hadn't you better close the door? (I think you'll agree you had better.)

    TENSE RESTRICTED TO FUTURE

    You had better close the door. (future)

    You had to close the door. (past requirement or necessity)

    I thought it was a good idea to close the door. (reworded to past)

    HAD BETTER ERRORS

    Had does not change form for tense or person. It always refers to the near future. Had is followed by not in a negative question but not in an positive question. Had better is always followed by the plain form (base) verb.

    HAD + BETTER + PLAIN FORM — ONLY!

    *You have better close the door open or…

    *He has better close the door open or…

    *You had better to close the door open or…

    *You had better closing the door open or…

    HAD BETTER → NOT

    * You hadn't better close the door or the cat will be trapped.

    POSITIVE QUESTION

    *Had you better close the door? (not used)

    *Had you better not close the door? (not used)

    TENSE NOT ADJUSTABLE WITHIN ANOTHER CLAUSE

    *I thought you had better close the door.

    (I thought you needed to / should have / ought to have closed the door.)

    *They had better leave before the hurricane arrived.

    (They needed to leave before the hurricane arrived.)

    Had better restricts meaning to future. No tense adjustment (backshifting) can be done when embedded within another clause (e.g., He said that we had better leave immediately. He says that we had better leave immediately.)

    Solution - lightbulb Pop-Q "Had Better"

    ¹The infinitive is "split" with not.

    ought / ought to (Huddleston 3 §2.5.4)

    Creative Commons License

    Ought to: Grammar Quizzes by Julie Sevastopoulos is licensed for use under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 International.

    Had Better: Grammar Quizzes by Julie Sevastopoulos is licensed for use under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 International.


    6.4.1: Could/Should/Ought to/Had Better is shared under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by LibreTexts.

    • Was this article helpful?