5.1: A Desire to Listen

Last updated
Save as PDF

Page ID: 94527

\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

See 449a-451b. Socrates’ four interlocutors, Polemarchus, Adeimantus, Thrasymachus, and Glaucon, interrupt and ask what he meant by suggesting “that, as regards women and children, anyone could see that it will be a case of friends sharing everything in common.” (This had slipped into the discussion, in passing, back at 423e-424a.) How, they wonder, are the children of the rulers and auxiliaries to be conceived and raised? Socrates hesitates – how far do they want to get into this “swarm of arguments”? – until Glaucon declares that “it is within moderation . . . for people with any sense to listen to such arguments their whole life long.” Socrates agrees to proceed, but only after making it clear that the matters about which he is going to speak are matters about which he is unsure, about which he is searching for the truth, and about which he would hate to mislead his friends.

What kind of a desire is a desire to listen to arguments? Is it what Socrates would call an appetitive desire – something fun to do while waiting for the torch race on horseback to start up – or is it something else?
Do Glaucon and the others expect to be persuaded to share wives and children? What do they hope to get out of listening to Socrates’ arguments?
Do you suppose Socrates knows where he is going with this discussion? Does he have everything worked out, or is he discovering as he goes along?
Is Glaucon right about arguments of this kind being the sort of thing worth studying one’s “whole life long”? Do you expect that you will study the Republic again at a later point in your life?