Skip to main content
Humanities LibreTexts

5.05: Unit #5 Summary

  • Page ID
    127561
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    Unit #5 Summary

    Thaddeus Robinson

    In this unit we looked at four of the most common types of inductive arguments: Arguments from Analogy, Inference to the Best Explanation, Inductive Generalization, and Inductive Application.  We use each one of these types of argument multiple times every day.  In each case, we learned how to identify these arguments by type, learned what makes them logically strong, and isolated key questions to ask in evaluating for logical strength.

    Key Questions for Specific Inductive Argument Types

    Two Questions to Ask of Arguments from Analogy:

    • Is the noted similarity relevant to the inferred similarity?
    • Are there differences that are relevant?

    Three Questions to Ask of Inferences to the Best Explanation:

    • How likely is the proposed explanation?
    • Are there other plausible explanations?
    • Would the truth of the proposed explanation be less surprising than the truth of any competitor?

    Two Questions to Ask of Inductive Generalizations:

    • Is the sample large enough?
    • Is the sample diverse enough?

    Two Questions to Ask of Inductive Applications:

    • Is the individual in question a member of the subject class or not a member of the predicate class?
    • Is the individual in question a member of other relevant classes?

    Key Terms

    Inference to the Best Explanation

    Poor Explanation

    Hasty Explanation

    Generalization

    Subject Class

    Predicate Class

    Universal Generalization

    Statistical Generalization

    Inductive Generalization

    Sample

    Population

    Margin of Error

    Sample Size

    Sample Diversity

    Hasty Generalization

    Biased Generalization

    Random Sample

    Availability Heuristic

    Inductive Application

    Affirming the Predicate Class

    Denying the Subject Class

    Hasty Application

    Misapplication

    Arguments from Analogy

    Analogues

    Relevant Similarity

    Relevant Differences

    Fundamental Attribution Error

    Further Reading

    For a deeper engagement with many of the issues raised in this chapter see the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy’s entries on “Analogy and Analogical Reasoning,” “Inductive Logic,” and “Abduction.”  See also Choice and Chance: An Introduction to Inductive Logic by Brian Skyrms.  For more about inference to the best explanation see Peter Lipton’s aptly titled book Inference to the Best Explanation.

     


    This page titled 5.05: Unit #5 Summary is shared under a CC BY-NC license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Thaddeus Robinson.

    • Was this article helpful?