1.3.2: Annotation rubric 20 points
- Page ID
- 14945
This page is a draft and is under active development.
“Confidence Gap” Annotation Exercise: Total Score ________/20
Annotation Score - 10
Article Score |
Outstanding 90-100% 18-20 |
Satisfactory 80-89% 16-17 |
Emerging 70-79% 14-15 |
Unsatisfactory 60-69% 12-13 |
Incomplete <60%/11 |
Annotation Score: ___/20 |
Key elements highlighted and labeled including main idea, supporting ideas/reasons, supporting facts and other evidence, headings, terms, and questionsas noted in the packet list.Work reflects engaged effort, critical thinking, and CLOSE, ACCURATE READING. |
Article is highlighted and labeled (annotated) thoroughly with a high degree of accuracy, with adequate effort and evidence of close reading. Contains additional annotations from packet guideline list. |
Article is highlighted and annotated and the work shows some effortful engagement, but lacks completeness and accuracy. Contains some annotations from packet guideline list. |
Article is incompletely highlighted and labeled, does not reflect effortful engagement, and lacks in completeness and accuracy. Contains few annotations from packet guideline list. |
Article contains some highlighting and labeling, but the work is incomplete and does not reflect CLOSE, ACCURATE READING. Contains few or no annotations from packet guideline list. |
“Confidence Gap” Annotation Exercise: Total Score ________/20
Annotation Score - 10
Article Score |
Outstanding 90-100% 18-20 |
Satisfactory 80-89% 16-17 |
Emerging 70-79% 14-15 |
Unsatisfactory 60-69% 12-13 |
Incomplete <60%/11 |
Annotation Score: ___/20 |
Key elements highlighted and labeled including main idea, supporting ideas/reasons, supporting facts and other evidence, headings, terms, and questionsas noted in the packet list.Work reflects engaged effort, critical thinking, and CLOSE, ACCURATE READING. |
Article is highlighted and labeled (annotated) thoroughly with a high degree of accuracy, with adequate effort and evidence of close reading. Contains additional annotations from packet guideline list. |
Article is highlighted and annotated and the work shows some effortful engagement, but lacks completeness and accuracy. Contains some annotations from packet guideline list. |
Article is incompletely highlighted and labeled, does not reflect effortful engagement, and lacks in completeness and accuracy. Contains few annotations from packet guideline list. |
Article contains some highlighting and labeling, but the work is incomplete and does not reflect CLOSE, ACCURATE READING. Contains few or no annotations from packet guideline list. |