Skip to main content
Humanities LibreTexts

References

  • Page ID
    16745
  • \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    ( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\)

    \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\)

    \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\)

    \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}}      % arrow\)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \)

    \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)

    \(\newcommand{\avec}{\mathbf a}\) \(\newcommand{\bvec}{\mathbf b}\) \(\newcommand{\cvec}{\mathbf c}\) \(\newcommand{\dvec}{\mathbf d}\) \(\newcommand{\dtil}{\widetilde{\mathbf d}}\) \(\newcommand{\evec}{\mathbf e}\) \(\newcommand{\fvec}{\mathbf f}\) \(\newcommand{\nvec}{\mathbf n}\) \(\newcommand{\pvec}{\mathbf p}\) \(\newcommand{\qvec}{\mathbf q}\) \(\newcommand{\svec}{\mathbf s}\) \(\newcommand{\tvec}{\mathbf t}\) \(\newcommand{\uvec}{\mathbf u}\) \(\newcommand{\vvec}{\mathbf v}\) \(\newcommand{\wvec}{\mathbf w}\) \(\newcommand{\xvec}{\mathbf x}\) \(\newcommand{\yvec}{\mathbf y}\) \(\newcommand{\zvec}{\mathbf z}\) \(\newcommand{\rvec}{\mathbf r}\) \(\newcommand{\mvec}{\mathbf m}\) \(\newcommand{\zerovec}{\mathbf 0}\) \(\newcommand{\onevec}{\mathbf 1}\) \(\newcommand{\real}{\mathbb R}\) \(\newcommand{\twovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\ctwovec}[2]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\threevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cthreevec}[3]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfourvec}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\fivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{r}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\cfivevec}[5]{\left[\begin{array}{c}#1 \\ #2 \\ #3 \\ #4 \\ #5 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\mattwo}[4]{\left[\begin{array}{rr}#1 \amp #2 \\ #3 \amp #4 \\ \end{array}\right]}\) \(\newcommand{\laspan}[1]{\text{Span}\{#1\}}\) \(\newcommand{\bcal}{\cal B}\) \(\newcommand{\ccal}{\cal C}\) \(\newcommand{\scal}{\cal S}\) \(\newcommand{\wcal}{\cal W}\) \(\newcommand{\ecal}{\cal E}\) \(\newcommand{\coords}[2]{\left\{#1\right\}_{#2}}\) \(\newcommand{\gray}[1]{\color{gray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\lgray}[1]{\color{lightgray}{#1}}\) \(\newcommand{\rank}{\operatorname{rank}}\) \(\newcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\col}{\text{Col}}\) \(\renewcommand{\row}{\text{Row}}\) \(\newcommand{\nul}{\text{Nul}}\) \(\newcommand{\var}{\text{Var}}\) \(\newcommand{\corr}{\text{corr}}\) \(\newcommand{\len}[1]{\left|#1\right|}\) \(\newcommand{\bbar}{\overline{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bhat}{\widehat{\bvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\bperp}{\bvec^\perp}\) \(\newcommand{\xhat}{\widehat{\xvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\vhat}{\widehat{\vvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\uhat}{\widehat{\uvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\what}{\widehat{\wvec}}\) \(\newcommand{\Sighat}{\widehat{\Sigma}}\) \(\newcommand{\lt}{<}\) \(\newcommand{\gt}{>}\) \(\newcommand{\amp}{&}\) \(\definecolor{fillinmathshade}{gray}{0.9}\)

    References

    Addams, J. (1997). A Function of the Settlement House. In L. Menand (Ed.), Pragmatism: A reader (p. 273-286). New York: Vintage.

    Adler, A. (1907). Studie über Minderwertigkeit von Organen. Vienna: Urban & Schwarzenberg.

    Albertini, J. (2008). Teaching of writing and diversity: Access, identity, and achievement. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, and text (pp. 383-393). New York: Routledge.

    Alexander of Villedieu. (1199). Doctrinale.

    Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In Lenin and philosophy and other essays (pp. 121-76). New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Anderson, J. (2008). The collection and organization of written knowledge. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 177-190). New York: Routledge.

    Aristotle (1991). On rhetoric: a theory of civic discourse (G. A. Kennedy, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Ashmore, M. (1993). The theatre of the blind: Starring a Promethean prankster, a phony phenomenon, a prism, a pocket, and a piece of wood. Social Studies of Science, 23, 67-106.

    Atkinson, D. (1999). Scientific discourse in socio-historic context. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Bacon, F. (1605). The advancement of learning. London

    Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Bakhtin, M. (1984a). Problems of Doestoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Bakhtin, M. (1984b). Rabelais and his world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Bakhtin, M M. (1986) The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Vern W. McGee (trans.), Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (pp. 60-102). Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Bakhtin, M. (1990). Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Bakhtin, M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Barthes, R. (1977). Image-music-text. London: Fontana.

    Bates, E., & Goodman, J. (1997). On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(5/6), 507-586.

    Bates, E., & Goodman, J. (1999). On the emergence of grammar from the lexicon. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 29-79). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Baumann, R. (1986). Story, performance, and event: Contextual studies of oral narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Bazerman, C. (1984a). Modern evolution of the experimental report: Spectroscopic articles in Physical Review, 1893-1980. Social Studies of Science, 14, 163-96.

    Bazerman, C. (1984b) The writing of scientific non-fiction: Contexts, choices and constraints. Pre/Text, 5(1), 39-74.

    Bazerman, C. (1985). Physicists Reading Physics: Schema-Laden Purposes and Purpose-Laden Schema. Written Communication, 2(1), 3-23.

    Bazerman, C. (1987a). Codifying the social scientific style: The APA Publication Manual as a behaviorist rhetoric. In J. Nelson, A. Megill, & D. McCloskey (Eds.), The rhetoric of the human sciences (pp. 125-144). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Bazerman, C. (1987b). Literate acts and the emergent social structure of science. Social Epistemology, 1(4), 295-310.

    Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Bazerman, C. (1991). How natural philosophers can cooperate: The rhetorical technology of coordinated research in Joseph Priestley’s History and Present State of Electricity. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions (pp. 13-44). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Bazerman, C. (1993a). Intertextual self-fashioning: Gould and Lewontin’s representations of the literature. In J. Selzer (Ed.), Understanding scientific prose (pp. 20-41). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Bazerman, C. (1993b). Money talks: The rhetorical project of Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations. In W. Henderson et al. (Eds.), Economics and language (pp. 173-199). New York: Routledge.

    Bazerman, C. (1994a). Constructing experience. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Bazerman, C. (1994b). Systems of genre and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79-101). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Bazerman, C. (1994c). Whose moment? The kairotics of intersubjectivity. In Constructing experience. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Bazerman, C. (1997). Discursively structured activities. Mind, Culture and Activity, 4(4), 296-308.

    Bazerman, C. (1999a). The languages of Edison’s light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Bazerman, C. (1999b). Letters and the social grounding of differentiated genres. In D. Barton & N. Hall (Eds.), Letter writing as a social practice (pp. 15-30). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Bazerman, C. (2000a). A rhetoric for literate society: The tension between expanding practices and restricted theories. In M. Goggin (Ed.), Inventing a Discipline (pp. 5-28). Urbana: NCTE.

    Bazerman, C. (2000b). Singular utterances: Realizing local activities through typified forms in typified circumstances. In A. Trosberg (Ed.), Analysing the discourses of professional genres (pp. 25-40). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Bazerman, C. (2001a). Anxiety in action: Sullivan’s interpersonal psychiatry as a supplement to Vygotskian psychology. Mind, Culture and Activity, 8(2), 174-186.

    Bazerman, C. (2001b). Writing as a development in interpersonal relations. Journal for the Psychoanalysis of Culture and Society, 6(2), 298-302.

    Bazerman, C. (2005). Practically human: The pragmatist project of the interdisciplinary journal Psychiatry. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 1(1), 15-38.

    Bazerman, C. (2006). The writing of social organization and the literate situating of cognition: Extending Goody’s social implications of writing. In D. Olson & M. Cole (Eds.), Technology, literacy and the evolution of society: Implications of the work of Jack Goody (pp. 215-240). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.

    Bazerman, C. (Ed.). (2008). Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, and text. New York: Routledge.

    Bazerman, C. (2009). Genre and cognitive development. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 279-294). Fort Collins, Colorado: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press.

    Bazerman, C. (2012). Writing with concepts: Communal, internalized, and externalized. Mind, Culture and Activity 19(3), 259-272.

    Bazerman, C. & de los Santos, R. (2005). Measuring incommensurability: Are toxicology and ecotoxicology blind to what the other sees? In R. Harris (Ed.), Rhetoric and incommensurability (pp. 424-463). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.

    Bazerman, C. & Rogers P. (2008a). Writing and secular knowledge apart from modern European institutions. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, and text (pp. 143-156). New York: Routledge.

    Bazerman, C. & Rogers P. (2008b). Writing and secular knowledge within modern European institutions. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, and text (pp. 157-176). New York: Routledge.

    Beaufort, A. (2008). Writing in the professions. In C. Bazerman (Ed.). Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 217-232). New York: Routledge.

    Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Bergmann, J. (1993). Discreet indiscretions. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Bergmann, J., & Luckmann, T. (1995). Reconstructive genres of everyday communication. In U. Quasthoff (Ed.), Aspects of oral communication. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Blasi, A. (1998). George Herbert Mead’s transformation of his intellectual context. In L. Tomasi (Ed.), The tradition of Chicago sociology. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Bloomfield, L. (1914). Introduction to the study of language. New York: Henry Holt.

    Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Press

    Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Bourdieu, P. (1990) The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language & symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Brooks, C. (1947). The well-wrought urn: Studies in the structure of poetry. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Buber, M. (1937). I and Thou. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Bulmer, M. (1986). The Chicago school of sociology. University Of Chicago Press.

    Burke, K. (1950). A Rhetoric of Motives. University of California Press.

    Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Calhoun, C. (2006). Pierre Bourdieu and social transformation: Lessons from Algeria. Development and Change 37(6), 1403-1415.

    Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Collins, H. (1985). Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Collins, J. (2011). Indexicalities of language contact in an era of globalization: Engaging John Gumperz’ legacy. Text and Talk, 31(4), 407-428.

    Conboy, M. (2008). Writing and journalism: Politics, social movements, and the public sphere. In C. Bazerman (ed.). Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text (pp. 205-220). New York: Routledge.

    Coser. R. L. (1966). Role distance, sociological ambivalence, and transitional status systems. American Journal of Sociology, 72(2), 173-187.

    Coser, R. L. (1975). The complexity of roles as a seedbed of individual autonomy. In L. Coser (Ed.), The idea of social structure. New York: Harcourt.

    Coulmas, F. (1996). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Cozzens, S. (1985). Comparing the sciences: Citation context analysis of papers from neuropharmacology and the sociology of science. Social Studies of Science, 15, 127-53.

    Daniels, H. (Ed.) (1996). An introduction to Vygotsky. London: Routledge.

    Daniels, H., Wertsch, J., & Cole, M. (Eds.) (2007). The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Daniels, P. T., & Bright, W. (1996). The World’s writing systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Darnell, R. (1989). Edward Sapir: linguist, anthropologist, humanist. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Dear, P. (1985). Totius in verba: Rhetoric and authority in the early royal society. Isis, 76, 145-61.

    Delamont, S., & Atkinson, P. (2001). Doctoring uncertainty: Mastering craft knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 31(1), 87-107

    De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetrics. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.

    De los Santos, R. (2007). Nation building as rhetoric and socio-cultural activity: Two institutional moments in post-revolutionary Mexico, 1928-1940 (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 3283759)

    De Man, P. (1983). Blindness and insight: Essays in the rhetoric of contemporary criticism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Derrida, J. (1981). Writing and difference. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Devitt, A. (1991). Intertextuality in tax accounting: Generic, referential, and functional. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions (pp. 336-380). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3, 357-370.

    Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogic creed. School Journal, 54, 77-80

    Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D. C. Heath.

    Dewey, J. (1922). Habits as social functions. Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology (pp. 14-23). New York: Modern Library.

    Dewey, J. (1947). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.

    Dickstein, M. (Ed.) (1998). The revival of pragmatism: New essays on social thought, law, and culture. Durham NC: Duke University Press.

    Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (Eds.) (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D. & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

    Empson, W. (1947). Seven types of ambiguity. NY: New Directions.

    Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.

    Engeström, Y. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 64-103). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Engeström, Y., Brown, K., Christopher, L. C., & Gregory, J. (1997). Coordination, cooperation, and communication in the courts: Expansive transitions in legal work. In M. Cole, Y. Engestrom, & O. Vasquez (Eds.) Mind, culture, and activity: Seminal papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Engeström, Y., & Escalante, V. (1995). Mundane tool or object of affection? The rise and fall of the Postal Buddy. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 335-373). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Faris, R. (1979). Chicago sociology, 1920-1932. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Feffer, A. (1993). The Chicago pragmatists and American progressivism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage Books.

    Fromm, E. (1961). Marx’s concept of man. New York: Ungar.

    Gadamer, H-G. (1975). Hermeneutics and social science. Philosophy Social Criticism/Cultural Hermeneutics, 2, 307-316.

    Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Geertz, C. (1980). Negara: The theatre state in nineteenth-century Bali. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Gelb, I. J. (1952). A study of writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Genette, G. (1992). The architext. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Genette, G. (1997a). Palimpsests. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Genette, G. (1997b). Paratexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Giddens, A. (1987). Social theory and modern sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Gilbert, N., & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora’s box: A sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.

    Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York: Basic Books.

    Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. New York: Harper Colophon.

    Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48. 1-17.

    Gogtay, N. et al. (2004). Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. PNAS, 101(2), 8174-8179.

    Goodwin, C. (1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp. 225-246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-33.

    Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Goody, J. (1986). The logic of writing and the organization of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Graham, S. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A meta-analysis. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 187-207). New York: Guilford.

    Gross, A. G., Harmon, J. E., & Reidy, M. S. (2002). Communicating science: The scientific article from the 17th century to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Gross, A., & Keith, W. (Eds.) (1996). Rhetorical hermeneutics: Invention and interpretation in the age of science. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Günthner, S., & . (1995). Culturally patterned speaking practices—The analysis of communicative genres. Pragmatics, 5(1), 1-32.

    Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Gumperz, J. (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context (pp. 229-252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3d ed.). London: Arnold.

    Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

    Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. (1993). Writing science. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Hanks, W. (1990). Referential practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Hanks, W. (1996). Language and communicative practices. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Harris, R. (2000). Rethinking writing. London: The Athlone Press.

    Harris, R. (1981). The language myth. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Harris, R. (1987). Reading Saussure: A critical commentary on the Cours de linguistique générale. London: Duckworth.

    Harris R. A. (Ed.) (2005). Rhetoric and incommensurability. West Lafayette IN: Parlor Press.

    Havelock, E. (1971). Prologue to Greek Literacy. Cincinnati: University of Cincinnati Press.

    Havelock, E. (1981). The literate revolution in Greece and its cultural consequences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge University Press.

    Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. New York: Harper & Row.

    Hemingway, E. (1958). The art of fiction No. 21. Interviewed by George Plimpton. Paris Review 18.

    Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. New York: Polity Press.

    Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English.

    Hogan, P. (2008). Writing as art and entertainment. In C. Bazerman (Ed.) Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 191-204). New York: Routledge.

    Hopper, P., & Traugott, E. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Howe, M. D. W. (1957). Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: The proving years, 1870-1882. Belknap Press.

    Husserl, E. (1964). The Idea of Phenomenology. Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Inglese, T. (2010). Can archived TV interviews with social science scholars enhance the quality of students’ academic writing? In C. Bazerman et al. (Eds.), Traditions of writing research (pp. 309-324). New York. Routledge.

    Iser, W. (1980). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology (2 vols.). New York: Holt.

    James, W. (1912). Essays in Radical Empiricism. New York: Longman Green and Co.

    Joas, H. (1985). G. H. Mead: A contemporary re-examination of his thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Joas, H. (1993). Pragmatism and social theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Johnson, C. M., & Karin-D’Arcy, M. R. (2006). Social attention in nonhuman primates: A behavioral review. Aquatic Mammals, 32(4), 423-442.

    Johnson, S. (1755). A Dictionary of the English Language. London.

    Kasanin, J. (Ed.). (1944). Language and thought in schizophrenia. University of California Press.

    Kilpatrick, W. H. (1951). Philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan Co.

    Kozulin, A. (1990). Vygotsky’s psychology: A biography of ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress.

    Lerner, G. H. (1993). Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text, 13(2), 213-245.

    List of Language Regulators. (2012). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_language_regulators

    Lowth, R. (1762). A Short Introduction to English Grammar. London.

    Luckmann, T. (1995). On the communicative adjustment of perspectives, dialogue and communicative genres. In E. Goody (Ed.), Social Intelligence and Interaction: Expressions and Implications of the Social Bias in Human Intelligence (pp. 175-186). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Luhmann, N. (1983). The differentiation of society. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Luria, A. R. (1961). The role of speech in the regulation of normal and abnormal behavior. New York: Pergamon.

    Luria, A. R. (1968). The mind of a mnemonist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Luria, A. R. (1969). Speech development and the formation of mental processes. In M. Cole & I. Maltzman (Eds.), A handbook of contemporary soviet psychology (pp. 121-162). New York: Basic Books.

    Luria, A. R. (1970). The functional organization of the brain. Scientific American, 222 (3), 66-78.

    Luria, A. R. (1972). The man with a shattered world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Luria, A. R. (1978). The selected writings of A.R. Luria. White Plains: M. E. Sharpe.

    Luria, A. R. (1979). The making of mind: A personal account of Soviet psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Luria, A. R., & Yudovich, R. (1959). Speech and the development of mental processes in the child. London: Staples Press.

    McCarthy, L. P. (1991). A psychiatrist using DSM-III: The influence of a charter document in psychiatry. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions (pp. 358-378). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    McCarthy, L. P., & Gerring, J. P. (1994). Revising psychiatry’s charter document, DSM-IV. Written Communication, 11(2), 147-192.

    Marx, K. (1909). Capital: Critique of political economy. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr.

    Marx, K. (1963). The eighteenth brumaire Of Louis Bonaparte. New York: International Publishers.

    Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1970). The German ideology (3d rev. ed.). Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Matthews, F. (1977). Quest for American sociology: Robert E. Park and the Chicago school. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Mauss, M. (1922). The Gift: forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. London: Routledge.

    McMurry, C. A. (1920) Teaching by projects: A basis for purposeful study. New York: Macmillan.

    Mead, G. H. (1913). The social self. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 10, 374-380.

    Mead, G. H. (1929). A pragmatic theory of truth. Studies in the Nature of Truth. University of California Publications in Philosophy 11 (pp. 65-88). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Mead, G. H. (1936). The problem of society: How we become selves. In M. H. Moore (Ed.), Movements of thought in the nineteenth century (pp. 360-385). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Medawar, P. B. (1964). Is the scientific paper fraudulent? Saturday Review, 1, 42-43.

    Medvedev, P. N. (1978). The formal method in literary scholarship. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Menand, L. (1997). Pragmatism: A reader. New York: Vintage.

    Menand, L. (2001). The metaphysical club: A story of ideas in America. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux .

    Merton, R. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1, 894-904.

    Merton, R. K. (1938a). Science, technology and society in seventeenth century England. OSIRIS: Studies on the History and Philosophy of Science and on the History of Learning and Culture, IV(2), 360-632. Bruges, Belgium: St. CatherinePress.

    Merton, R. K. (1938b). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672-682.

    Merton, R. K. (1940). Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces, 18, 560-568.

    Merton, R. K. (1945). Role of the intellectual in public bureaucracy. Social Forces, 23, 405-415.

    Merton, R. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. Antioch Review, 8, 193-210.

    Merton, R. K. (1949). Social Structure and Anomie: Revisions and Extensions. In R. N. Anshen (Ed.), The family: Its functions and destiny (pp. 226-257). New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Merton, R. K. (1950a). Contributions to the theory of reference group behavior (with A. Rossi). In R. K. Merton & P. F. Lazarsfeld, (Eds.) Continuities in social research (pp. 40-105). New York: The Free Press.

    Merton, R. K. (1950b). Patterns of influence: A study of interpersonal influence and communications behavior in a local community. In P. F. Lazarsfeld & F. Stanton (Eds.), Communications Research, 1948-49 (pp. 180-219). New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Merton, R. K. (1957a). Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 635-659.

    Merton, R. K. (1957b). The role-set: Problems in sociological theory. British Journal of Sociology, 8, 106-120.

    Merton, R. K. (1959). Social conformity, deviation and opportunity structures. American Sociological Review, 24(2), 177-189.

    Merton, R. K. (1961). Singletons and multiples in scientific discovery. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 105(5), 470-486.

    Merton, R. K. (1963). The ambivalence of scientists. Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital, 112, 77-97.

    Merton, R. K. (1965). On the shoulders of giants: A Shandean postscript. New York: The Free Press.

    Merton, R. K. (1968a). The Matthew effect in science: the reward and communication systems of science are considered (with H. A. Zuckerman). Science, 199, (3810), 55-63.

    Merton, R. K. (1968b). Social theory and social structure, enlarged edition. New York: Free Press.

    Merton, R. K. (1971). Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalization, structure and functions of the referee system (with H. A. Zuckerman). Minerva, 9(1), 66-100.

    Merton, R. K. (1973). Sociology of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Merton, R. K. (1976). Sociological ambivalence. New York: The Free Press.

    Merton, R. K. (1989). Unanticipated consequences and kindred sociological ideas: A personal gloss. In C. Mongardini & S. Tabboni (Eds.), L’Opera di Robert K. Merton e la sociologia contemporanea (pp. 307-329). Genova: ECIG.

    Merton, R. K. (1995). The Thomas theorem and the Matthew effect. Social Forces, 74(2), 379-424.

    Merton, R. K., Coleman, J. S., & Rossi, P. (Eds.) (1979). Qualitative and quantitative social research: Papers in honor of Paul F. Lazarsfeld. New York: The Free Press.

    Merton, R. K., Reader, G., & Kendall, P. (Eds.) (1957). The student physician. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-67.

    Miller, C. (1992). Kairos in the rhetoric of science. In S. Witte et al. (Eds.), A rhetoric of doing (pp. 310-27). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Moss, J. D. (1993). Novelties in the heavens. University of Chicago Press.

    Murphy, J. J. (1971). Three medieval rhetorical arts. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Myers, G. (1991). Stories and styles in two molecular biology articles. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions (pp. 45-75). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Natanson, M. (1956). The social dynamics of G. H. Mead. Washington D.C.: Public Affairs Press.

    Nietzsche, F. (2008). The birth of tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Ochs, E., Schegloff, E., & Thompson, S. (Eds.) (1996). Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Ong, W. (1958). Ramus, method, and the decay of dialogue: From the art of discourse to the art of reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. New York: Routledge.

    Olson, D. (2008). History of schools and writing. In C. Bazerman (Ed.) Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 283-292). New York: Routledge.

    Paus, T. (1999). Structural Maturation of Neural Pathways in Children and Adolescents: In Vivo Study. Science, 283(5409), 1908-1911.

    Peirce, C. (1958). The collected papers. Volume 8. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Perelman, L. (1991). The medieval art of letter writing: Rhetoric as institutional expression. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual Dynamics of the Professions (pp. 97-119). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Petanjek, Z. et al. (2011). Extraordinary neoteny of synaptic spines in the human prefrontal cortex. PNAS, 108(32), 13281-13286

    Pfuetze, P. (1954). The social self. New York: Bookman.

    Plimpton, G. (1958). Ernest Hemingway, The art of fiction No. 21. The Paris Review, 18. Retrieved from http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/4825/the-art-of-fiction-no-21-ernest-hemingway

    Pohlman, H. L. (1984). Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes & utilitarian jurisprudence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Prendergast, C. (1986). Alfred Schutz and the Austrian school of economics. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1-26.

    Prior, P., & Lunsford, K. (2008). History of reflection, theory, and research on writing. In C. Bazerman (ed.) Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 81-96). New York: Routledge.

    Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1922). The Andaman islanders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1931). Social organization of Australian tribes. Melbourne, Macmillan & Co.

    Richards, I. A. (1924). The principles of literary criticism. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.

    Richards, I. A. (1929). Practical criticism. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.

    Riffaterre, M. (1984). Intertextual representation. Critical Inquiry, 11(1), 141-162.

    Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. London: Constable.

    Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Rosch, E. (1977). Human categorization. In Warren, N. (Ed.), Advances in cross-cultural psychology 1 (pp. 1-72). New York: Academic Press.

    Rosenthal, S. B., & Bourgeois, P. L. (1991). Mead and Merleau-Ponty: Toward a common vision. Albany: SUNY.

    Rowe, D. (2009). Early written communication. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, J. Riley, & M. Nystrand. The Sage handbook of writing development (pp. 213-231). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Ruestow, E. G. (1996). The microscope in the Dutch Republic: the shaping of discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Russell, D. (1991). Writing in the academic disciplines, 1870-1990: A curricular history. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Russell, D. (1995). Activity theory and its implications for writing instruction. In J. Petraglia (Ed.), Reconceiving writing, rethinking writing insruction (pp. 51-77). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Russell, D. (1997a). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14(4), 504-554.

    Russell, D. (1997b). Writing and genre in higher education and workplaces. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4(4), 224-237.

    Russell, D. (2010). Writing in Multiple Contexts: Vygotskian CHAT Meets the Phenomenology of Genre. In C. Bazerman et al. (Eds.), Traditions of writing research (pp. 353-364). New York: Routledge.

    Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation (2 vols.). Oxford: Blackwell

    Sacks, O. (1985). The man who mistook his wife for a hat. London: Duckworth.

    Sacks, O. (1989). Seeing voices. New York: Vintage.

    Sacks, O. (1995). An anthropologist on Mars, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Sacks, O. (1996). The island of the colorblind. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Sapir, E. (1912). Language and environment. American Anthropologist, 14, 226-242.

    Sapir, E. (1917). A Freudian half-holiday, review of Sigmund Freud, Delusion and Dream. The Dial, 63, 635-637.

    Sapir, E. (1923). The two kinds of human beings, review of C. G. Jung, Psychological Types or the Psychology of Individuation. The Freeman, 8, 211-212.

    Sapir, E. (1927a). Speech as a personality trait. American Journal of Sociology, 32, 892-905.

    Sapir, E. (1927b). The unconscious patterning of behavior in society. In E. S. Dummer, (Ed.), The unconscious: A symposium (pp. 114-142). New York.

    Sapir, E. (1934a). The emergence of the concept of personality in a study of cultures. Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 408-415.

    Sapir, E. (1934b). Personality. In E. R.A. Seligman (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 12 (pp. 85-87). New York: Macmillan.

    Sapir, E. (1935). Communication. In E. R.A. Seligman & A. S. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 4 (pp. 78-81). New York: Macmillan.

    Sapir, E. (1938). Why cultural anthropology needs the psychiatrist. Psychiatry, 1, 7-12.

    Sapir, E. (1949). The status of linguistics as a science. In D. G. Mandelbaum (Ed.). Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture, and personality. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Saussure, F. de. (1983). Course in general linguistics. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.

    Scharer, P. L., & Zutell, J. (2003) The development of spelling. In N. Hall, J. Larson, & J. Marsh (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood literacy (pp. 271-286). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Schegloff, E. A (1987). Between micro and macro: Contexts and other connections. In J. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Munch & N. Smelser (Eds.), The micro-macro link (pp. 207-234). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Schegloff, E. A (1996). Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52-133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Schmandt-Besserat, D. (1996). How writing came about. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Schryer, C. (1994). The lab vs. the clinic: Sites of competing genres. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 105-124). London: Taylor and Francis.

    Schryer, C. (2002). Strategies for Stability and Change. In R. Coe & T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre (pp. 73-102). New York: Hampton Press.

    Schryer, C. et al. (2002). Structure and agency in medical case presentations. In Bazerman, C. & Russell, D. (Eds.) Writing selves/writing societies: Research from activity perspectives. Fort Collins, Colorado: The WAC Clearinghouse.

    Schutz, A. (1951). Making music together: A study in social relationship. Social Research, 18 (1), 76-97.

    Schutz, A. (1967a). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Schutz, A. (1967b). The problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Schutz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1973). The structures of the life-world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Searle, J. R. (1992). The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.

    Searle, J. R., & Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Selting, M., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (Eds.) (2001). Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Shklar, J. N. (2004). Squaring the hermeneutic circle. Social Research, 71(3), 657-658.

    Slobin, D. I. (1987). Thinking for speaking. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 435-445. Retrieved from http://elanguage.net/journals/bls/article/view/2508/2475

    Small, H. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8, 327-40.

    Smart, G. (1993). Genre as community invention: A central bank’s response to its executives’ expectations as readers. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 124-140). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Smart, G. (2003). A central bank’s “communications strategy”: The interplay of activity, discourse genres, and technology in a time of organizational change. In C. Bazerman and D. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves/writing societies: Research from activity perspectives (pp. 9-61). Fort Collins, Colorado: The WAC Clearinghouse.

    Smart, G. (2006). Writing the economy: Activity, genre, and technology in the world of banking. London: Equinox.

    Smart, G. (2008). Writing and the social formation of economy. In C. Bazerman (Ed.) Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 103-112). New York: Routledge.

    Smith, A. (1976). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (R. H. Campbell & A. S. Skinner, Eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Smith, A. (1978). Lectures on jurisprudence (R. L. Meek, D. D. Raphael, & F. G. Stein, Eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Smith, A. (1980). Essays on philosophical subjects (W. P. D. Wightman, Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Smith, A. (1983). Lectures on rhetoric and belles lettres (J. C. Bryce, Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Smith A. (1986). The theory of moral sentiments (D. D. Raphael & A. L. Macfie, Eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Smith, D. E. (1990). Texts, facts, and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. London: Routledge

    Smith, D. E. (2002). Texts and the ontology of organizations and institutions. Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies, 7(2), 159-198.

    Smith, D. E., & Schryer, C. (2008) On documentary society. In C. Bazerman (Ed.) Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 113-128). New York: Routledge.

    Smith, T. V. (1931). The social philosophy of George Herbert Mead. American Journal of Sociology, 37(3), 368-85.

    Sokal, A., & Bricmont, J. (1999). Fashionable nonsense: Postmodern intellectuals’ abuse of science. NY: Picador.

    Stinchcombe, A. L. (1975). Merton’s theory of social structure. In L. Coser (Ed.), The idea of social structure (pp. 11-34). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Street, B. V. 1985. Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.

    Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Tanner, L. (1997). Dewey’s laboratory school: Lessons for today. New York: Teachers’ College Press.

    Taubes, G. (1993). Bad science: The short life and weird times of cold fusion. New York: Random House.

    Thomas, W.I. (1923). The unadjusted girl. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

    Thomason, B. C. (1982). Making sense of reification: Alfred Schutz and constructionist theory. London: Macmillan.

    Tiersma, P. (1999). Legal Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Tiersma, P. (2008). Writing, text, and the law. In C. Bazerman (Ed.) Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 125-138). New York: Routledge.

    Tiersma, P. (2010). Parchment, paper, pixels: Law and the technologies of communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Todorov, T. (1990). Genres in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Tomasello, M. (2006). Why don’t apes point? In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 506-524). Oxford & New York: Berg.

    Tomasi, L. (Ed.) (1998). The tradition of Chicago sociology. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Van der Veer, R. (2007). Lev Vygotsky. London: Continuum.

    Van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky. A quest for synthesis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.) (1994). The Vygotsky Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Veresov, N. N. (1999). Undiscovered Vygotsky: Etudes on the pre-history of cultural-historical psychology. New York: Peter Lang.

    Vocate, D. R. (1987). The theory of A.R. Luria: Functions of spoken language in the development of higher mental processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Volosinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Volosinov. V. N. (1987). Freudianism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Vygotsky, L. S. (1925). The methods of reflexological and psychological investigation. Metodika refleksologicheskogo i psikhologicheskogo issledovanija. In K. N. Kornilov (Ed.), Problemy sovremennoj psikhologii (pp. 26-46). Leningrad: Gosudarstevennoe Izdarel’stvo.

    Vygotsky, L. S. (1939). Thought and speech. Psychiatry, 2(1), 29-52.

    Vygotsky, L. S. (1967). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Soviet Psychology, 5(3), 6-18.

    Vygotsky, L. S. (1971). The psychology of art. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (Alex Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Vygotsky, L. S. (1993). Fundamentals of defectology (J. Knox & C. Stevens, Trans.). New York: Plenum Press.

    Vygotsky, L. S. (1994) Adolescent pedagogy. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Vygotsky reader. Blackwell 1994;

    Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). Consciousness as a problem in the psychology of behavior. In N. Veresov (Ed.), Undiscovered Vygotsky: Etudes on the pre-history of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 251-281). Bern: Peter Lang.

    Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. R. (1993). Studies on the history of behavior: Ape, primitive, and child. Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Wertsch, J. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Wilkins, J. (1668). An Essay towards a real character and a philosophical language. London.

    Wimsatt, W. K, & Beardsley, M. (1946). The intentional fallacy, Sewanee Review, 54, 468-488.

    Wimsatt, W. K, & Beardsley, M. (1949). The affective fallacy. Sewanee Review, 57, 31-55.

    Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus logico-philosophicus (C. K. Ogden, Trans.), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Wynn, J. (2012). Evolution by the numbers: The origins of mathematical argument in biology. ParlorPress.