5.3.5: Emergin Adulthood Peer Annotation Rubric
- Page ID
- 16010
\( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } \) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\)
Peer evaluation for “Emerging Adulthood” Annotation Homework – 10 points
Article/Scores |
Outstanding 90-100% |
Satisfactory 80-89% |
Emerging 70-79% |
Unsatisfactory 60-69% |
Incomplete <60% |
“Emerging Adulthood”
Score: ___/___ |
Key elements highlighted and labeled including main idea, supporting ideas/reasons, supporting facts and other evidence, headings, terms, and questions. Work reflects engaged effort, critical thinking, and CLOSE, ACCURATE READING. |
Article is highlighted and labeled (annotated) thoroughly with a high degree of accuracy, with adequate effort and evidence of close reading. | Article is highlighted and annotated and the work shows some effortful engagement, but lacks completeness and accuracy. | Article is incompletely highlighted and labeled, does not reflect effortful engagement, and lacks in completeness and accuracy. | Article contains some highlighting and labeling, but the work is incomplete and does not reflect CLOSE, ACCURATE READING. |
Score: ____/____ TOTAL POINTS (Dr. Kiefer awards final grade.) |
Peer Evaluation Points
Peer Name | 9-10 pts | 8 pts | 7 pts | 6 pts |
Peer #1 Comment or Suggestion:
Peer #2 Comment or Suggestion:
After you receive your peer points and comments: Write one clear, specific goal regarding your own annotation work: