Skip to main content
Humanities Libertexts

5.3.5: Emergin Adulthood Peer Annotation Rubric

  • Page ID
    16010
  • Peer evaluation for “Emerging Adulthood” Annotation Homework – 10 points

    Article/Scores

    Outstanding

    90-100%

    Satisfactory

    80-89%

    Emerging

    70-79%

    Unsatisfactory

    60-69%

    Incomplete                               <60%

    “Emerging Adulthood”

     

    Score: ___/___

    Key elements  highlighted and labeled including main idea, supporting ideas/reasons,

    supporting facts and other evidence, headings, terms, and questions. Work reflects engaged effort, critical thinking, and CLOSE, ACCURATE

    READING.

    Article is highlighted and labeled (annotated) thoroughly with a high degree of accuracy, with adequate effort and evidence of close reading. Article is highlighted and annotated and the work shows some effortful engagement, but lacks completeness and accuracy.  Article is incompletely highlighted and labeled, does not reflect effortful engagement, and lacks in completeness and accuracy. Article contains some highlighting and labeling, but the work is incomplete and does not reflect CLOSE, ACCURATE READING.
    Score: ____/____ TOTAL POINTS (Dr. Kiefer awards final grade.)

     

    Peer Evaluation Points

    Peer Name 9-10 pts 8 pts 7 pts 6 pts
             
             

    Peer #1 Comment or Suggestion:

     

    Peer #2 Comment or Suggestion:

     

    After you receive your peer points and comments:  Write one clear, specific goal regarding your own annotation work:

    • Was this article helpful?