4.2.4: Annotation and Cornell Note Rubric
- Page ID
- 15042
“Nature Nurture” Annotation and Cornell Note Rubric: Total Score ________/20
Annotation Score - 10 points each:
Article Scores |
Outstanding 90-100% |
Satisfactory 80-89% |
Emerging 70-79% |
Unsatisfactory 60-69% |
Incomplete <60% |
Annotation Score: ___/___ |
Key elements highlighted and labeled including main idea, supporting ideas/reasons, supporting facts and other evidence, headings, terms, and questions. Work reflects engaged effort, critical thinking, and CLOSE, ACCURATE READING. |
Article is highlighted and labeled (annotated) thoroughly with a high degree of accuracy, with adequate effort and evidence of close reading. |
Article is highlighted and annotated and the work shows some effortful engagement, but lacks completeness and accuracy. |
Article is incompletely highlighted and labeled, does not reflect effortful engagement, and lacks in completeness and accuracy. |
Article contains some highlighting and labeling, but the work is incomplete and does not reflect CLOSE, ACCURATE READING. |
Cornell Note Taking Score – 10 points
5 (100%) |
4 (80%) |
3 (60%) |
2 (40%) |
0 Little or no effort |
|
Overall Requirements and Cornell Format Score: _____ |
Overall, exceeds requirements in all areas, including a complete cue/heading column, phrase form notes in the note column, and a summary. Outstanding work effort. |
Meets all requirements with satisfactory effort, completion, quality and organization. |
Meets all or most requirements with adequate work that varies in quality from strong to weak or incomplete. |
Meets less than the minimum requirements, and/or the work is low quality or unfinished, reflecting incomplete work indicating low course engagement. |
Fails to complete the assigned work and take daily notes. |
Quality of Headings and Notes Score: _____ |
“Cue column” headings/labels are clear, concise and can be easily used for self-study. Notes are clear, complete, significant, and reflect a high level of cognitive engagement with the material. Notes are in PHRASE FORM and reflect effortful performance. |
Headings are mostly clear and reflect content of the significant aspects of the reading. Notes are thorough, detailed, and reflect understanding of the assignment and/or what is required by the purpose of the entry. |
Headings are uneven; a lack of headings, questions, terms in the cue column. Some notes reflect thoughtful engagement with the material or purpose, but the quality varies from strong to less than satisfactory. |
Few headings appear in the cue column. notes are incomplete, unclear and/or some significant notes are missing. Reflects low effort and course engagement. |
Fails to meet the quality requirements. |